|
The 2010 Commission on Narcotic Drugs – report of proceedings |
|
|
The CND Proceedings Document aims to provide a summary of what happened
at this year's 53rd Commission on Narcotic Drugs, including at the
various satellite events, and offers a comprehensive analysis of the
key discussions and debates that took place during the meeting.
The 2010 Commission on Narcotic Drugs report
of proceedings
International Drug Policy Consortium Briefing, April 2010
|
|
The 2007 Commission on Narcotic Drugs |
|
|
International
Drug Policy Consortium Briefing Nr. 5, March 2007
This briefing paper summarises the proceedings and
outcomes of the 2007 CND. It includes discussion of a wide range of issues -
from technical debates on the rescheduling of dronabinol, to the plans for the
global review of the 1998 UNGASS objectives - and comments on the performance
of the UN agencies in this field, and of the workings of the CND itself. Download the report (pdf)
|
|
The UN Drug Control Debate |
|
|
Current Dilemmas and Prospects for 2008
Martin Jelsma
48th ICAA Conference on Dependencies
Budapest, 24 October 2005
The 48th session of the UN Commission on Narcotic
Drugs (CND), 7-11 March in Vienna, was plagued by controversy about the
legitimacy of harm reduction policies. Ending in stalemate, guidance
for UNODC to operate in this field remains ambiguous. In June, at the
Programme Coordinating Board (PCB), a consensus was reached regarding a
mandate for UNAIDS to be involved in needle exchange programmes and
other harm reduction activities among injecting drug users. What
options are available to clarify UNODCs mandate in this area and more
in general to achieve a breakthrough in policy dilemmas that surfaced
recent years at the UN level. Worldwide trends seem to indicate a
growing divergence between zero tolerance ideology and pragmatic
approaches, leading to tensions between the letter and spirit of the UN
conventions on the one hand and daily practices in an increasing number
of countries on the other hand. How can UNODC, but also UNAIDS and WHO,
operate efficiently and coherently amidst these tensions? A well
prepared procedure for the 2008 review of the 1998 General Assembly
Special Session on drugs will be required to address these dilemmas in
a serious way.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Cracks in the Vienna Consensus |
|
|
The UN Drug Control Debate
WOLA Drug War Monitor, January 2004
Martin Jelsma en Pien Metaal
Numerous UN conferences and summits have been devoted to negotiating a
harmonized global approach to illicit drugs. Yet more and more cracks
are now beginning to appear in the supposedly universal model which is,
in reality, based on a highly fragile consensus. The failure to counter
the ever-growing problems related to the abuse of illicit drugs has led
countries to question the validity of current policies and to
experiment with approaches less driven by the US-inspired ideology of
"zero tolerance" and more rooted in pragmatism. This has led to
increasing acceptance of the concept of harm reduction for consumers,
where drug use is treated as a public health rather than a law
enforcement problem. On the production side, discussion centers on the
need to secure alternative livelihoods for involved farmer communities
and how to most effectively promote alternative development.
Download the full report (pdf)
|
|
|
Political Challenges Posed by the Failure of Prohibition |
|
Drugs in Colombia and the Andean-Amazonian Region
Ricardo Vargas Meza
TNI Drug Policy Briefing 16, May 2006
TNI associate fellow Ricardo Vargas looks at drug control policies from Colombia.
Download the full briefing (pdf)
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Breaking the Impasse |
|
|
Polarisation & Paralysis in UN Drug Control
Drugs & Conflict Debate Paper 5, July 2002
The past decade has seen an increasing polarisation between divergent
trends in global drug policies. On the one hand, there has been an
escalation in the US driven War on Drugs, which has created a drug
gulag domestically and increased and militarised forced eradication
abroad. On the other hand, in Europe and several like-minded countries,
a more flexible and pragmatic approach has gained ground in domestic
drug policy-making, taking distance from indiscriminate repression and
the zero-tolerance approach. In these countries, the trend towards
greater leniency has become irreversible and rational thinking is
gradually replacing the dogmas of the past. Such tolerant approaches
have reached their legal limits within the framework of the current UN
Drug Conventions.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|