Wednesday, 4 August 2010
Experts and policymakers have gathered in Vienna for the 18th International AIDS Conference to evaluate current trends in HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention. Despite the widespread attention given to the subject, countries around the world continue to maintain draconian drug laws that are increasing the spread of the disease. Several leading AIDS, human rights and drug policy reform organisations and leading scientists are calling for urgent action to change current drug laws and incorporate evidence-based approaches to drug and HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention to reverse this trend.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
New Website Documents Human Toll of the “War on Drugs” |
 Wednesday, 14 July 2010
TNI-WOLA's new drug law reform website documents the human toll of failed drug policies
in Latin America, providing information, analysis, testimonies and
information on efforts for reform.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Do we really want a Russian UN Drug Czar? |
Friday 9 July 2010
According to the Transform blog, it has been confirmed that the Russian diplomat Yuri V. Fedotov has been appointed as the new Executive Director of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC). What will be the implications? Russia has one of the worst records on drug policy and
human rights: it ignores scientific evidence on effective
HIV prevention among drug users and its punitive drug laws push drug
users to the margins of society. Afghan opium poppy farmers could suffer from this appointment as well. The Russians hold them responsible for the 30,000 drug deaths in Russia every year.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
INCB Interferes with Countries' Sovereignty |
|
The UN's International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) 2009 annual report
criticizes Argentina, Brazil and Mexico for moving to decriminalize the
possession of drugs for personal consumption,
cautioning that such moves may "send the wrong message." According
to the Transnational Institute (TNI) and the Washington Office on
Latin America (WOLA), the criticisms overstep the INCB's mandate and
constitute unwarranted intrusions into these countries' sovereign
decision-making.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|