In 2004 the Transnational Institute (TNI) and the Andreas G. Papandreou Foundation (APF) started an Informal Drug Policy Dialogue. Purpose of the dialogues is to have an open-minded exchange of views on current dilemmas in international drug policy making and discuss strategies on how contradictions might be resolved. The meetings are guided by 'Chatham House Rule' to encourage a free exchange of thoughts and confidentiality. In 2007, TNI and the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) started a Latin American Informal Drug Policy Dialogue.
Page 3 of 3


 
						 The third Informal Drug Policy Dialogue was co-hosted by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health.  Participants, most of whom are actively involved in policy, included  over forty people from 21 countries, six inter-governmental  organisations, five international NGOs and several academics. The  two-day dialogue had four sessions focused on (1) the effectiveness of  law enforcement in supply reduction, (2) recent developments around  HIV/AIDS and harm reduction, (3) Bolivia and legal options for the coca  leaf and (4) preparations for the 2008 UNGASS Review.  In addition,  participants were invited to visit the Bern city drug injection  facility, where managers explained how the facility functioned and gave a  guided tour of the premises.
The third Informal Drug Policy Dialogue was co-hosted by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health.  Participants, most of whom are actively involved in policy, included  over forty people from 21 countries, six inter-governmental  organisations, five international NGOs and several academics. The  two-day dialogue had four sessions focused on (1) the effectiveness of  law enforcement in supply reduction, (2) recent developments around  HIV/AIDS and harm reduction, (3) Bolivia and legal options for the coca  leaf and (4) preparations for the 2008 UNGASS Review.  In addition,  participants were invited to visit the Bern city drug injection  facility, where managers explained how the facility functioned and gave a  guided tour of the premises.
 The second Informal Drug Policy Dialogue was co-hosted by the Department for Drug Strategic Affairs  of the Hungarian Ministry of Youth, Family, Social Affairs and Equal  Opportunities. The two-day dialogue was focused on three themes: (1) harm  reduction developments at the regional and UN level; (2) alternative  development: dilemmas around coca and opium reduction efforts; and (3)  preparations for the 2008 UNGASS review. Participants had the opportunity to exchange information and make comments from their own perspective on developments in these policy areas. The aim was to come to workable suggestions and ideas that could be used in the ongoing debate.
The second Informal Drug Policy Dialogue was co-hosted by the Department for Drug Strategic Affairs  of the Hungarian Ministry of Youth, Family, Social Affairs and Equal  Opportunities. The two-day dialogue was focused on three themes: (1) harm  reduction developments at the regional and UN level; (2) alternative  development: dilemmas around coca and opium reduction efforts; and (3)  preparations for the 2008 UNGASS review. Participants had the opportunity to exchange information and make comments from their own perspective on developments in these policy areas. The aim was to come to workable suggestions and ideas that could be used in the ongoing debate. The meeting is hosted by the Orthodox Academy in Kolymbari (Crete). The thirty participants include ministerial officials from several countries, representatives from UN and European institutions, and non-governmental drug policy experts. The two-day dialogue was focused on three themes: (1) explore common  ground within a set of general parameters by which 'best practice' or  effective drug policy is judged not on dogma or on moral principle but  on scientifically evaluated, empirical evidence; (2) the policy debate  on cannabis; (3) harm reduction developments at the regional and UN  level; and (4) supply reduction.
The meeting is hosted by the Orthodox Academy in Kolymbari (Crete). The thirty participants include ministerial officials from several countries, representatives from UN and European institutions, and non-governmental drug policy experts. The two-day dialogue was focused on three themes: (1) explore common  ground within a set of general parameters by which 'best practice' or  effective drug policy is judged not on dogma or on moral principle but  on scientifically evaluated, empirical evidence; (2) the policy debate  on cannabis; (3) harm reduction developments at the regional and UN  level; and (4) supply reduction.


