• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

Statement about the coca leaf

Statement in support of the Bolivian announcement to ask for the un-scheduling of the coca leaf from the list controlled substances of the 1961 UN Single Convention.

Transnational Institute / International Drug Policy Consortium (IDCP)

March 12, 2008

Thematic debate on the follow-up to the 20th special session of the General Assembly (UNGASS)
Agenda Item III Countering drugs supply
(i) areas requiring further action

NGO Contribution

Transnational Institute (Institute for Policy Studies)
Member of International Drug Policy Consortium

The resolution of ambiguities regarding the coca leaf

Since 1952 until 1988, the drug control system has criminalized the coca leaf. The 2007 Annual Report of the International Narcotics Control Board is by far the most aggressive since the 1961 Single Convention, which proclaimed the elimination of traditional use in 25 years. The 1988 Convention re-acknowledged this ancestral practice.

As a result of the 2006 INCB report (that gave clear signals regarding the Board’s concerns over Bolivia’s national policy towards the coca leaf) the Bolivian government extended an invitation to the Board to visit the country in order to enlighten them on their new strategy on drugs control and coca leaf policies. The 2006 report had expressed concerns that these policies "could serve as a precedent and may send the wrong message to the public if it is allowed to stand".[1] Bolivian governments have protested against this for decades.

Although the Board’s visit was interpreted as generally positive on the Bolivian side, the 2007 INCB report shows no signs of an increased sensitivity towards the Bolivian claim on the rights of their indigenous population, and the general public, to consume the coca leaf in a traditional manner by chewing the leaf, and even goes as far as to consider drinking coca tea, as "not in line with the provisions of the 1961 Convention". [2] The Board considers Bolivia, Peru and a few other countries [3] to allow such practises to be in breach with their treaty obligations, and insists, "each party to the Convention should establish as a criminal offence, when committed intentionally, the possession and purchase of coca leaf for personal consumption". [4]

The fact that this would involve prosecuting several million people does not seem to be proportional to the claimed crime, particularly since most consumers use the coca leaf for beneficial health purposes, and coca tea drinking a well-recognized practise to counter altitude sickness.

The absurd call by the Board contradicts their own forward to the report that talks about "respect for national sovereignty, for the various constitutional and other fundamental principles of domestic law - practice, judgements and procedures - and for the rich diversity of peoples, cultures, customs and values". [5]

Although the 1961 Convention established that "Coca leaf chewing must be abolished within twenty-five years from the coming into force of this Convention," [6] when this temporary rule came to its end, the then democratically elected governments of Bolivia and Peru managed to have part of the damage done reverted in the 1988 Convention, by having a partial recognition included, stating "The measures adopted shall respect fundamental human rights and shall take due account of traditional licit use, where there is historic evidence of such use". [7]

In this years report, the Board denies the validity of this article, or any reservation made by parties, since it does not "absolve a party of its rights and obligations under the other international drug control treaties" . [8]

The INCB makes its worst mistake to refer to the coca leaf with the false assumption that harm is inflicted upon people's health when consuming the coca leaf, when referring to "the role it plays in the progression of drug dependence". [9] This claim bears no scientific or medical evidence, and is exclusively based on a long forgotten and obsolete study done in 1950 in which racial prejudice and questionable methodologies were used. [10]

The approach adopted in the report towards this complex and sensitive issue demonstrates a surprising ignorance and insensitivity not suitable for a UN body, particularly following their visit to Bolivia, and after the recent adoption of the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. For this reason, we support the announcement of Bolivia to ask for the un-scheduling of the coca leaf from the list controlled substances of the 1961 Convention.

References

1 INCB report 2006, paragraph 361

2 INCB report 2007, paragraph 217

3 Probably the Board is referring here to Argentina, Chile and Colombia, where chewing and tea drinking are practised by some groups and in certain regions of these countries.

4 INCB report 2007, paragraph 219

5 INCB report 2007, Foreword

6 Single Convention 1961, Article 49, Par 2 e)

7 United Nations Convention against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988, article 14, paragraph 2.

8 INCB report 2007, paragraph 220

9 Idem, paragraph 48

10 Economic and Social Council: Official record Fifth year; twelfth session: Special supplement No11: report of the Commission of Enquiry on the Coca Leaf, May 1950. New York; United Nations, 1950 (E/1666-E/CN.7/AC.2/1)

  • Labels
    10-year Review | conventions | CND | UNGASS | coca | INCB | bolivia

Drugs in the News

  • UK’s first regular drug checking service set to launch this month in Bristol
    12.05.2022
  • Sadiq Khan appoints drugs tsar to explore legalising cannabis
    12.05.2022
  • Germany speeds up the process to legalize recreational cannabis
    09.05.2022
  • DULF keeps distributing checked drugs as Health Canada flags denial
    05.05.2022
  • Switzerland to launch adult-use cannabis sale trial program this summer
    05.05.2022
  • Why cannabis prices are plunging – unlike just about everything else
    02.05.2022
More news

Weblog

    Statement on the UN Common Position and Task TeamStatement on the UN Common Position and Task Team
    15.04.2021
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  33 afghanistan  24 hide
africa  10 albania  13 alternative development  118 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  81 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  96 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  45 barbados  11 belgium  36 belize  10 bermuda  12 bolivia  115 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  44 california  209 cambodia  12 canada  519 cannabinoids  95 cannabis  3001 cannabis clubs  197 cannabis industry  392 caribbean  146 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  129 coca  214 cocaine  70 coffee shop  218 cognitive decline  30 colombia  149 colorado  161 compulsary detention  19 conflict  4 conventions  254 corporate capture  48 corruption  4 costa rica  10 crack  54 craft cannabis  30 crime  76 czech republic  31 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  879 deforestation  8 denmark  122 drug checking  40 drug consumption rooms  191 drug courts  22 drug markets  140 drug policy index  2 drug testing  7 drug trade  52 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  64 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  21 eradication  127 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  6 european drug policy  81 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  95 fair trade  15 fentanyl  79 france  111 fumigation  25 gateway theory  29 georgia  3 germany  172 ghana  17 global commission  46 greece  19 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  338 hemp  40 heroin  134 heroin assisted treatment  79 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  98 honduras  3 human rights  252 ICC  1 illinois  10 incarceration  52 INCB  137 india  94 indigenous rights  1 indonesia  35 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  14 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  63 italy  42 jamaica  170 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  31 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  406 lebanon  43 legal highs  63 legalization  1525 lesotho  8 local customization  8 luxembourg  42 malaysia  7 malta  36 medical cannabis  635 mental health  44 methamphetamine  46 mexico  209 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  41 money laundering  54 morocco  117 naloxone  15 nepal  7 netherlands  307 new york  28 new zealand  67 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  6 norway  17 NPS  10 opinion polls  126 opioids  147 opium  93 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  22 peru  42 peyote  3 philippines  89 pleasure  5 police pacification  18 portugal  68 potency  2 precursors  6 prevention  3 prison situation  98 producers  139 prohibition  144 proportionality  110 psychedelics  13 psychosis  53 puerto rico  3 racism  29 reclassification  117 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1278 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  29 safer crack  29 scheduling  27 scientific research  140 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  66 singapore  6 social justice  73 south africa  71 spain  79 st lucia  9 st vincent and grenadines  31 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  31 sweden  28 switzerland  142 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  46 teen use  43 thailand  60 thresholds  51 tobacco industry  17 tramadol  17 treatment  27 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  14 UK  270 UN Common Position  1 UN drug control  428 UNGASS  58 UNODC  110 uruguay  144 US drug policy  1164 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  131 WHO  62 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf